Thursday 31 March 2011

Guess The Sex




Clue: The driver was not a man but was not responsible (they never are) and the court will no doubt take her tears into consideration. She's clearly not fit to drive, and equally clearly as thick as fucking shit, but that's no reason to prevent her from risking other lives by denying her hard won right to hold a licence, not by any means.

Mrs Pankhurst, whom Mr Pankhurst might reasonably have slapped about a bit (what jury would have convicted him), would have been proud of her. That video reminds me of the story, reported elsewhere on this blog, of the woman who drove along a railway line because the satnav had told her to. She was not responsible either. A society that endows the irresponsible with rights is doomed.

The sisters are doing it for themselves (I once infuriated a gaggle of misandrist feminists by adding 'until the batteries run out') and God help the rest of us.

Addendum:

Here's a video of the aftermath, notice that all of those sorting out the chaos and clearing up the mess caused by one extremely stupid young woman are men (this video and the text following it were added after the comment left by UBERMOUTH):



Rather than inventing 'pay gaps' between men and women, in pursuit of yet more profitable victimhood, it might be more illuminating to examine the relative costs, socially, economically and environmentally, of men and women.

Another:


View Larger Map

Zoom into the larger map to see the arrows indicating the direction of travel and wonder.

4 comments:

UBERMOUTH said...

I know I do a great disservice to women worldwide by laughing at your commentary, but I DID!

A LOT!

Well written!

William Gruff said...

You're very kind, thank you.

Your comment illustrates what I think is a fundamental difference between men and women: that automatic solidarity with each other, regardless of the circumstances, when a woman is criticised by a man. You've agreed with me but have acknowledged some sense of betrayal of other women in doing so, as though you feel you're letting the side down.

An interesting experiment would be to put a man alone in a room filled with women and a woman alone in a room filled with men and then instruct one individual in each room to abuse verbally the single individual of the opposite sex. I'd put money on the women quickly ganging up on the lone man, even physically assaulting him, and the men even more quickly ganging up on the male abuser in defence of the lone woman, even physically assaulting him. It might be worthwhile considering whether that blind, irrational reactionary 'patriotism' is more a feminine trait than a masculine one.

Many thanks for your typically very kind comment.

UBERMOUTH said...

LOL

I would defend the man if he was being 'unfairly' abused by the women.

Of course the woman in the clip should not be allowed to drive a tryke, but I was suggesting I was doing a disservice laughing at your rather sexist commentary[which presumed this was typical of women drivers and the bit about her hubby understandably beating her] awful , awful but awfully funny- and you know me, funny wins out, Always.

It's a good thing I know how sweet you really are[and how adorable]. :)

William Gruff said...

Well you're a sweetie yourself.